By Erin StewartDeseret Morning News
Copyright 2004 Deseret Morning News
A majority of Utahns favor raising sales taxes to pay for preserving open space, a proposal that will be on November's ballot, according to a Deseret Morning News/KSL-TV poll conducted by Dan Jones & Associates.
If the election were held today, 65 percent of the 915 registered voters polled statewide would vote for Initiative 1, a $150 million bond that would pay to improve air and water quality, build parks and preserve open space through a .05-cent sales tax hike.
Only 28 percent of those surveyed said they would vote against the ballot item sponsored by Utahns for Clean Water, Clean Air & Quality Growth. The poll, conducted Sept. 6-9, has a 3 percent margin of error.
The wide margin of support came as no surprise to Amanda Smith, head of the sponsoring group. She said land preservation and open space is something Utahns agree on.
"These numbers reflect our gut and what we've been seeing all along," Smith said. "This issue really activates people. They feel very strongly about it and are willing to dedicate their time and money to preserving open space."
But Randy Parker, CEO at the Utah Farm Bureau Federation, said the majority of Utahns say they are willing to open their wallets for the open space bond because it's a "feel-good initiative." What residents don't understand are the details of the initiative and the impact it will have on private property in Utah, he said.
The bond did not garner the needed approval in the Legislature this year, forcing Smith's group to organize and gather more than 76,000 signatures to earn the item a spot on this year's election ballot. The initiative just made the ballot in August, following an appeal by Smith's group to the Utah Supreme Court, leaving open-space activists in a time crunch to sell the proposal to voters already leery of more tax hikes.
Although support numbers are up for Initiative 1, Smith said her group will launch an advertising campaign to spread the message that the initiative is not just about open space but about ensuring a higher quality of life in Utah.
"We're talking about protecting the assets that we enjoy here in Utah in a responsible way," Smith said. "If people understand that they're getting these sort of public benefits, people overwhelmingly say that it is worth it and they're willing to pay."
Myles Rademan knows how willing people are to pay for preservation. As the public affairs officer in Park City, Rademan has seen his town support two $10 million bonds for open space with nearly 80 percent approval in the past five years.
When Park City officials started setting aside funds for open space, Rademan said Salt Lake residents and leaders laughed at the resort town for paying for free resources. Now, he said, the poll results show that other cities are catching on.
"I always hear the argument that we don't need more open space. Obviously, that's not the way 65 percent of the people feel," he said. "They want trails and nature out their back door. I do, too. So we opened our checkbook and paid for it."
Parker, however, sees a down side to the initiative. Currently, 78 percent of Utah land is government-owned. Pumping more money into government land acquisitions will only drive land prices up and pit private landowners against government officials with deep pockets, he said.
"For the future, a new generation of farmers and ranchers will be competing against tax dollars for these resources," Parker said.
The initiative nearly didn't make it on the ballot when state and local officials initially invalidated some signatures from Utah and Cache counties. But Smith's group appealed to the Utah Supreme Court, which ruled the signatures were valid.
Parker said the Farm Bureau is also opposed to Initiative 1 because it bypasses the regular legislative process. Without the compromise and information that stems from legislative debate, he said the initiative is simply a yes or no check-box on that ballot that voters do not truly understand.
That sentiment is echoed by state Sen. Howard Stephenson, R-Draper, and president of the Utah Taxpayers Association, who said the open-space initiative looks great on paper but is filled with provisions that citizens do not understand. Those misunderstandings, he said, are what led to the poll results showing support for the initiative.
"It sounds like motherhood and apple pie. We all love open space and clean air and clean water. We all do. But there is so much on the initiative that people do not know," Stephenson said.
Stephenson said he expects the initiative to fail at the voting booths in November after citizens get more information, which will mostly come from a press release and debate campaign that his organization will soon start. Making residents aware of the bond details in the short time before the election will be a difficult task now that two out of three residents already support the proposal, Stephenson said.
One such detail, he explained, is that $30 million of the $150 million bond will be set aside for municipal buildings, convention centers and parks. Those municipal buildings do not fall under the open space category that is being sold to voters, he said.
Another sticking point for Stephenson is that the money will be dispensed by the Utah Quality Growth Commission, a non-elected board.
"This is nothing short of pork-barrel politics," he said. "They will be able to identify the pork projects they want to be funded."
Not true, said John Bennett, project manager at the Commission. If the bond does pass, the Commission will grant money based on applications from a variety of preservation groups and individuals throughout the state, he said.
Although some money is set aside for particular projects, like the $16 million ear-marked for clean water and the $57 million for conservation, Bennett said the Commission will weigh each application fairly to determine who gets money.
"We've been the only source of land conservation funds for years. We know how to manage these funds and we're ready to step in and do it," he said.
More information:
http://www.utahlands2004.org
http://utfb.fb.org/ (forthcoming)